• May 3, 2024

Report: Jackson’s contract situation affecting his play

Sources close to DeSean Jackson tell Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the receiver’s obsession with a new contract has gotten so big, that it’s affecting his play on the field. While this isn’t anything we haven’t already suspected, McLane does get a little more detail.

One of the manifestations of this obsession, McLane’s sources say, is that Jackson spends a ton of time texting back and forth with his agent Drew Rosenhaus during the Eagles work day. If this doesn’t count as a distraction, I’m not sure what does.

And McLane says that, according to his sources, Jackson believes that he has far outperformed his rookie contract (no one will argue that) and that he has become increasingly under the “sway” of Rosenhaus. One source even said that Drew constantly stresses to D Jax that he has to pad his receiving stats and that lower numbers will hurt him in negotiations.

Upon first glance, it doesn’t seem like a bad idea. A receiver having huge stats can’t possibly hurt a team, can it? Well, yes and no. If he’s putting up those numbers then it’s fine. But, what if he’s not? And that’s when you start to see things boiling over. When Jackson doesn’t get the ball enough, he’ll become a huge problem (if he hasn’t already).

Neither Drew nor his brother Jason would give McLane a comment.

Another interesting piece of information is that Jackson has become less and less interested in returning punts. Maybe that was clear to Andy Reid last week when he had Jeremy Maclin field one. It’s no secret to any observer of this team that Jackson can’t wait to get to the ground or out of bounds on punt returns. He’s become a voluntary late-career Desmond Howard. It’s going to the house, getting fair caught or he’s stepping out of bounds.

And believe me I’m not one to crucify the guy for protecting his body. I think we all see both sides of this here. On one hand, DeSean is a little guy who is asked to do a lot and has had some concussion problems. He’s woefully underpaid, and will stay that way if he gets a big injury.

On the other hand, he’s only in the third year of his contract (though they’ve ripped up contracts at this point before) and there is no CBA in place at this point beyond 2010. And seeing a guy dogging it out there doesn’t exactly make Joe Banner bust out the check book.

We’ll see what happens, but clearly something needs to be worked out for the benefit of everyone.

Oh, and Happy Birthday, DeSean. He’s 24-years old today.

Micah Warren

Read Previous

Moyer has Tommy John surgery

Read Next

McClain is picking the Eagles

0 0 votes
Article Rating
67 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 5:40 pm

Is anyone sick & tired of hearing about whether D-Jax is unappy about this,that & the other thing…
Let’s him play the games and in the off-season see where his/agent head is and and how the Eagles FO & coaches want to move forward.. but the Eagles are in a playoff mode right now and don’t need these type of distractions and the media needs to worry about the Eagles opponents instead of off the field business deals between a player and the team…

scorpiodsu
scorpiodsu
December 1, 2010 5:42 pm

Yeah well he needs to act like a mature professional and produce and then the rest takes care of itself. Maybe not when you want it, but it will take care of itself. He wants to pad his stats but then doesn’t want to return punts? Dude gets mentioned for being a dual threat. A mature professional would say “well if I’m not getting my receptions, then I’m going to get my stats in returning the ball”. I guess not him. If he gets his money, great. If not, hopefully we’ll have a backup plan. I’m tired of these babies. We’ve already been TOed. I respect his courage for going out there week in and out but I don’t respect anyone who doesn’t perform their job while they are still being paid. Doesn’t these guys know that the best way to get your money is to play hard all the time? And not paying attention or taking things serious is the easiest way to not get paid?

scorpiodsu
scorpiodsu
December 1, 2010 5:43 pm

I’m with you Paulman. I’m just sick of hearing about it.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 5:46 pm

It’s very unlikley that he will be a Pro-Bowl at WR or Returner this year unless he has a big finish to the season, if he and his agent want a monster deal, then he needs to make some big plays.. Fair Catching Punts when you have room to run isn’s making big plays, dropping passes isn’t the way to pad your stats, loafing and running half speed on some routes and not engaging or blocking in
running plays is not the way to be a team player let alone a leader in the locker room…
he has immense talent and the drive rto excel and be the best, he has to channel his fristrations a bit better and realize that he is going to have some rough games,injuries,etc,etc.. keep your poise

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 5:49 pm

When Westy was in need of a contract they gave it too him….he had injury concerns…but meant a ton too the team. So pay him you beedy eyed jerk. This shoulda been addressed in the offseason.Theres zero reason too keep this guy waiting for a new deal.His catches have dropped off cause of many reasons..one being mostly cause Maclin is getting single covered cause there blanketing 10. His performance and play toome had not fallen off.He’s open and still getting open and check the first play of the Skins game.When they knew it was coming. HTF do you justify paying him like a back-up. You dont.

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 5:52 pm

Sorry…this dude is not loafing or giving up on plays. Thats utter b.s. Paul.WTF would he do that when he knows they would use it agaisnt him. The td catch he dropped mighta been a natural reaction considering the hit he took gainst Atlanta.

If he gets a new deal that pays him for the skills he brings its all good. Why not do that if it helps the team chemistry? The guy has single handidly helped us win games.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 6:01 pm

I’ll be honest,
Good WR’s are a dime a dozen, His deep threat and top speed are a rarity,even for the NFL…
but when looking a the total package.. he lacks the ability to run the short to intermediate routes due to his size and injuries, he doesn’t support any run blocking due to hiz size ,he’s not effective in the Red-Zone and if he isn’t going to handle Punt Returns, then to me, he becomes almost a part-time 35-40 play a gamm player and not worthy of a true #1 Pay…It is what it is ….
Give me a Greg Jennings, The Johnson Amigos (Calvin,Andre,Kevin), A Boldin, D Bowe, D Driver,
M Austin, someone who you have to account for on any pass route, and will play hard every play and hit some people on of the football field

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 6:05 pm

Sorry I forgot to mention R White, S RIce, H Nicks, K Britt,M Sims-Walker, R Wayne, B Lloyd, M Crabtree, M Colston, D Henderson, D Bryant, M Jenkins, A benn, M williams, S Williams,S Smith’s
H Ward, L Fitzgerald,, S Breaston, TJ Whoseyouragent,etc,etc … they are all over the NFL

anderson silva
anderson silva
December 1, 2010 6:11 pm

I don’t care if the Eagles pay him more, or he just goes out and does his job and makes plays because he is a professional. The Eagles have done contract “corrections” in the past, they will probaby do it for him, if his play continues to be stellar. If it drops off, then he doesn’t deserve the money anyway. In any case, the money aspect of this thing bores me.

anderson silva
anderson silva
December 1, 2010 6:13 pm

Oh, and I forgot, this is where you throw in something about Joe Banner is the antichrist. Jeff Lurie is a rich creep too. Maybe even a crack about Lurie’s wife or something else that has no bearing on anything but proves what a tough (that is read, idiotic) fanbase we have here.

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 6:14 pm

WTF is Kevin Johnson? Paulman…the fact you think Dwayne Bowe is on Deseans level shows you are an amatuer.Trade alert…right. 3-4 of those dudes on there draw triple coverage the rest dont. Desean does…cause he’s faster then everyone in the NFL. And dont post who you think is faster. Cause if they were…peoepl would talk about them when they mentioned 10. Devery Henderson.lol.Mike Jenkins.Sid Rice…with his busted hip huh?

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 6:17 pm

WTF does Luries wife have too do with it?

Joe Banner needs too get his ink pen out and do some drafting. No insults needed. Teams with a rich history and proud knowledgable fanbase are all like this bro.Go talk too a Steeler,Skin,Giant,and name it fan…same deal.

BirdoBeamen
BirdoBeamen
December 1, 2010 6:21 pm

EROCK, you have to pay attention to what paulman is saying.

Desean’s speed make him a rarity, but theres a guy JUST as fast (not quicker, but just as fast) on the other side of the state. You take away Desean’s speed and then what do you have? Nothing. He doesn’t have the greatest hands, he can’t out jump anybody….and quite frankly, his toughness is starting to come into question. Even during the Washington blowout, he caught the one deep ball and then was pretty much MIA. Point is, if Desean isn’t streaking down the field, he isn’t doing much of anything.

If things dont work out with DJAX, everything will be fine, we still have a number one….a more prototypical number one….in Maclin.

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 6:38 pm

I am…and its b.s.. And what you just said too me…is b.s.. My opinion. His hands arent good huh.okay…he snatchs the ball outta the air on deep balls and doesnt let it hit his body. I coached wides in my life . Too do that you have too have great hands.Ask Vick if he’s legit.Ok then. He did nothing after that cause they tripled him. If you take away his speed? Well you cant…thats who he is dude. His toughness…right…cause your not tough too be 175 playing reciever in the NFL. Pro bowl at 2 spots.Maclin is a beast . But without 10 on the other side…what is he? He was a rookie and came in and made plays from day one. Short memory with you guys. Sure Mike Wallace is just as fast?How come we dont see highlights of him catchn 90 yard bombs in that pass oriented offense?

Erock
Erock
December 1, 2010 6:45 pm

Reverses,fake reverses,quick hooks,deep outs,digs,shallow drags…all things he brings too this offense too make us explosive.Everytime he leaves the game what happens…safeties creep…..if he isnt streaking down the field he’s not doing anything? What games do you watch?

paulydak
paulydak
December 1, 2010 7:19 pm

I love 10 since Cal and he’s the most explosive WR in the game but he has to grow up and stop letting his paper affect his game (if that really is the case). How wise is it to act like a diva when you are asking for a pay raise? Did that work for Rosenshmuck and T.O.? Well if they wanted to blow up the locker room and get released a year after going to the Super Bowl, it worked out for them. Desean just needs to be a pro, play the game and then deal with his money when the year is over. Hell, maybe he catches 3 TDs in the Super Bowl and gets the MVP? You never know. Stop crying and play ball.

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 7:20 pm

DJAX will get paid and look guys most wideouts are looking for a safe place to fall anyway. Watch Reggie Wayne after a catch he’s right out of the Torry Holt school of diving at the defenders ankles. The thing DJAX can complain about is not being targeted in the offense enough and the FO bringing up that fact not to pay him. By the way all you folks saying Maclin is a prototypical 1, he sometimes looks scared as hell coming across the middle too.

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 7:30 pm

Whatever happened to all the articles/comments about how Desean would have a great year with Vick as his QB? That Vick fits Deseans’ skill sets and all that. I seem to remember reading about 20 of those.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 7:31 pm

Erock

The Eagles did not give Westbrook a new contract until years had passed. By the time they gave it to him, he was no longer performing at a high level. If they had given it to him while he earned it, they wouldn’t have had to keep him around for the 2-3 years that he under-performed. Because of the way his signing bonus figured into the salary cap, they really had no option but to keep him.

Paulman

I, unlike many, empathize with Jackson.

There are many players who have received and are receiving big money, but have done little or nothing to earn it. Jackson, on the other hand, has grossly out-performed his contract. No way should he be the lowest paid player on offense.

I believe in paying players their worth because it helps to keep a happy locker room. The risk for the player is so great. If you don’t believe me, just look at Leonard Weaver’s situation. I know he’s glad that he had already signed a good contract, because he’ll probably never play again. In fact, he’ll never walk the same.

When I look at how much the owners make in comparison to the what the players earn, it’s totally ridiculous. When it’s all said and done, the 1,500 or so players earn about 35% of the gross income (including merchandise). The 32 owners keep about 65%.

It’s not the contracts that drive ticket prices sky high. It’s what the owners keep. Why do you think Lurie became a billionaire so quickly?

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 7:35 pm

I agree Drummer and remember they want him to perform at a high level at more then one position, and Vinnie stop trying to wake up Dizzy!! LOL

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 7:43 pm

Vinnie

Jackson’s deep-ball threat has caused the best defenses to change their schemes.

With safeties lining up 20-30 yards deep, we should be exploiting that change.

When you successfully run the ball, it draws the safeties into the box. But because we have no power running game, there’s no threat. The loss of Weaver could be the cause for the lack of such a running game. But there are other ways to exploit the defensive changes. The screen pass is wide open, but we haven’t been calling it much.

This is a chess match.

Reid made a good move by going to max protect and rolling Vick out. NY countered with a right-side overload. Then Chicago dropped their safeties. It’s now Reid’s move.

Remember, with Kolb at QB, defenses didn’t have to make any changes because Kolb couldn’t get the ball to him. Were you happier with that?

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 8:00 pm

Drummer your trying to explain something to someone who will never get it. Thanks for trying though, the problem with the Eagles in this chess match is they have to exploit the middle of the field but I don’t know how often DJAX and Macklin want to venture over the middle. Now lining up and running the ball more then 10 times would have forced the Bears to bring at least one of there safeties closer to the box.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 8:11 pm

I think most teams will take their chances of the Eagles of attempting 8-10-12-14 play drives to get in into the End-Zone instead of the big-plays we saw earlier this season.. If the Red-Zone, Giimick plays
that don’t work in the Red-Zone, then teams will continue to employ it.. The Chances are better for oppoenents with this strategy for to have 3-4 long drives a game culminating in 7 points is much more difficult to attain for you have to have paitience, good execution, few penalties and few negative plays to sustain long drives.. plus you have to have a Coach and game plan that is patient to do this over a course of a game, then multiple games, then through the playoffs… Can Coach AR/MM
and the Eagle Offense be disciplined enough to do this.. Time will tell by if I were a betting man,
I would put my money on the opposing Defenses on good teams winning out…

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:17 pm

Jaxeagle

Once a running back breaks the line of scrimmage, it’s up to the linebackers and safeties to tackle him. Generally, a lineman is assigned to block the linebacker. If that linebacker is blocked successfully, the runner will have a head of steam. It’s very difficult to tackle somone who has a full head of steam. If the runner is big, he’ll run you over. If he’s elusive, he’ll juke you and run past you.

Before the play begins, a safety will generally move closer to the line of scrimmage to prevent the runner from getting a full head of steam. If he does that, he’s then susceptible to the long ball.

Against Chicago, Matt Forte ran over Quinten Mikell during their first series or a power sweep. After that initial hit, Mikell wanted nothing to do with tackling him. As a result, Forte averaged 8.2 yards per carry. On only 14 attempts, he had 117 yards rushing.

BigE
BigE
December 1, 2010 8:26 pm

He and Macklin can’t wait to duck for cover or hit the dirt. A couple of whimps. Shady with his running, receiving, blocking and playing with pain puts them both to shame. He is hurting the team with his
poor me attitude. Eagles could have beat the Bears if he had manned up!

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:28 pm

Paul

As you know, I have my issues with Reid. However, I think he’s excellent at play design. Because of that, my money’s on the Eagles. We have the weapons and I believe Reid will find a way to use them. (There was a long period of time when he didn’t think he needed weapons, but I digress.)

My problem with Reid (wherein play-calling is concerned) is the number of times he calls pass plays in succession. When a defense can pin its ears back, your QB becomes susceptible to injury – no matter who he is.

Think about it. The Eagles’ philosophy is to get a lead and force other teams to pass. That way, they can turn loose their linemen and the blitzes.

If we’re trying to force other teams to pass exclusively. Who does our offense do that regardless of the circumstance?

Our offense does exactly what we try to force other offenses to do.

Why do we pass as much as 88% of the time? That’s just begging to get your QB injured.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:30 pm

Big E

As much as I hate to admit it, I think Jackson has played scared. I don’t blame him for ducking. He can’t help us from the training room, but he’s dropped 3 TDs in the last 2 games.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:32 pm

Big E

As for Maclin, all I can say is that he’s produced. I wasn’t a big Maclin fan, based on how he played last year, but I’ve come to like him. He’s not T.O., in that he can’t take a short pass and turn into a 60-yard TD, but he’s got game.

By the way, it’s good to hear from you.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:37 pm

Vick missed a couple of throws over the middle, but generally did a good of job of hitting the passes between the linebackers and safeties. Avant was his main target, and consequently, our leading receiver.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:42 pm

Paulman

As for the red zone, we’ve always had problems down there and will probably continue to do so. Until we have a legitimate running threat from the 10-yard line, it’s relatively easy for defenses to cover our receivers for 10-15 yards.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 1, 2010 8:57 pm

It’s nothing new that Jackson is a one-trick pony.

Reid has always used a speed receiver coupled with a possession receiver.

During our Superbowl run, Pinkston only ran deep routes and her was also called out for “alligator arming.” Because of T.O.’s play, however, Pinkston made to the pro bowl.

Dante Stallworth was also used in that role.

What we’re lacking is a guy on the other side who can break tackles and take it to the house, ala T.O.

When you compare T.O. and Pinkston to Maclin and Jackson. Jackson is much better than Pinkston, but Maclin is a different type of receiver than T.O.

While Maclin is good, he’s not a No. 1. Larry Fitzgerald can take it to the house from anywhere on the field, likewise with other No. 1s. When the West Coast Offense first began, Jerry Rice could do the same.

Maclin hasn’t shown that type of ability. Reid’s formula doesn’t seem to work without a true No. 1, but all’s not said and done yet.

I made this comparison before the season began and some of you guys scoffed at the notion.

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 8:59 pm

Drummer,

Good analysis I think as far as the redzone goes I know they want to limit the number of hits Vick takes but they need to go empty backfield and threaten the defense with Vick as a runner then maybe our wideouts can get single coverage. I also think that Maclin has been better then advertised this year but as a guy who looks like he can get nasty he goes down far to easily in my opinion.

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 9:01 pm

You know Drummer when we drafted Maclin he was advertised as a guy who could take it to the house and make people miss, so far I haven’t seen that.

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 9:08 pm

Dummer,
Successful running games draw the safeties up? Really? Wow, I should write that down for future reference. And guys who run deep quickly back the DBs up? Did I get that right? Thanks man.

Real problem, since Birds haven’t really had a power running game since….hell who knows…Montgomery? A couple nice years with Staley I guess.

And what was that you said about teams adjusting to Vick?…that’s odd. I never once said that would happen at all. Oh wait…..I did say that….about 50x. The question is, do the Birds have the personnel to counteract the adjustments you’re talking about? Does Vick have the skill set to execute a New England style attack carving up the area between the hashes 10-20 yrds down the field. A style that requires 3 step drops and quick reads? Are teams really going to be intimidated by Avant catching 8 passes a game?

And most importantly, wIth Vick at the helm, will Reid be willing to attempt any adjustments? Or will it still be damn the torpedos full speed ahead?

I doubt we’ll find out tomorrow. With Houston’s pass D its going to be bombs away.

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 9:13 pm

Maclin isn;t as advertised? Here’s how his scouting report advertised him?

The better comparison is a poor man’s Reggie Wayne. Maclin will immediately help an offense and on special teams, just don’t expect a legit 1,000 season right away. Maclin will take time to learn the nuances of the National Football League, but he has a ton of potential and will stretch a defense like not many in the league can.

Hmmm

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 9:14 pm

listed at under 200 pounds, and around 6 foot, many doubt his ability to become a true #1 WR…hasn’t had to go over the middle and make the tough grab on a regular basis…not the red-zone threat that many 2009 prospects are…to get in to the end zone, an offense may have to be a bit more creative…

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 9:16 pm

Has sprinter speed and possesses acceleration that is second to none…ultra-talented, as he can make an impact in the passing, rushing, and returning game…has produced off the chart all-purpose yardage numbers…has been the focus of an offensive attack for several seasons now, and although the opposing defense has game planned to stop him, rarely any do…many times track stars are sloppy route runners, that is not the case in regards to Jeremy Maclin, his route running isn’t Jerry Rice caliber, but it is at least average…bottom line—if he gets a step on the defense, he’s gone…

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 9:16 pm

sounds exactly as advertised.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 9:44 pm

I think Maclin is getting there little by little,
Last year he ran scared and straight up and was easier to bring down.
This year he’s stronger, running in a better position and most importantly is playing with Confidence, he has speed, not D-JAx kind of speed, but speed non theless. I think they he is upright so often it looks as though he’s not running hard,but he moves pretty well..As he gets stronger in the upper body and legs to combine with his size and speed, he will be harder to bring down in the open field..
I think Vick,McCoy,Maclin,Avant,Dixon,Samuel and D Patterson are the most improved players on the team…
I also think D-Jax, Celek,Herremans, Bunkley,T Cole,Q Mickell have been the most disappointing players on the team so far.
I think you know what your going to get with Peters,Justice,Bradley,M Patterson,J Parker, N Cole week in and week out and new starters McGlynn,Fokou,Sims,N Allen, B Graham all have had their ups and downs as 1st year Starters in the NFL but do show some real promise

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 9:45 pm

really Vinnie, he looked like a deer in headlights when he was asked to return kicks and the next tackle he tries to break will be the first one, all the rest is spot on especially the redzone part. Can someone help me here what the hell is a legit 1,000 yard season?

Jaxeagle
Jaxeagle
December 1, 2010 9:48 pm

Paulman,

Vick is most improved and Mickell is a disappointment. I think Peters and Sims has picked it up a bit but Sims misses too many damn tackles.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 10:02 pm

Vick the most improved player on the Eagles and the entire NFL without a doubt.
Most disappointing would be close Celek,Bunkley,Mickell all are right there but I think Celek will have a strong finish while the other 2 continue to slide back.
In fact, I think Coleman will replace Mickell after this week if Mickell has another poor game and
Dixon has already taken snaps from Bunkley… even Mike Patterson has brought his game up a notch when paired with Dixon and seems to have a little more step in his bounce..

scorpiodsu
scorpiodsu
December 1, 2010 10:08 pm

I love Djax but there are plenty of receivers I’d take over him. Yes his speed is great but that’s all he has and you need more than that in a true number 1 receiver. His speed is not normal and for anyone to think you must cater to everything Desean Jackson because he’s fast is being a little unrealistic. I am in partial agreement with paulman. If Jackson isn’t returning punts and is only good for deep routes that d-coordinators take away, then he’s not worth #1 receiver money. I do agree he’s worth more than what he’s making but not #1 money. He’s as effective as Avant in the intermediate passing games and running the ball you might as well line Kolb up out there because he’ll block better than Desean. I’m not saying that I don’t want the guy because I do, but not at an absurd cost.

And bwest got his money at an entirely different point in his career. It was not in the 3rd year of his rookie contract. Making that comparison was dumb from the beginning. I do agree Jackson should be paid more EVENTUALLY but in no way should that change how he plays the game. Period. I lose respect for players who don’t know how to be professionals. You take care of the on field stuff and you’ll be taken care of off the field. Quite simple. And as far as what the owner makes, to me that’s irrelevant. The CEO of my company makes my yearly salary in a couple days. Do I want more money? Yes but the like any company or organization in the world the top dog gets the biggest piece of the pie. Fair? Maybe. But thats how it works. I believe players should be paid their worth BUT I also believe they should honor their contracts and play with the same effort regardless. I believe that everything will happen in it’s time. Now when you’re a free agent, rape these teams for every cent. When you’re not, play with your contract. Period.

BirdoBeamen
BirdoBeamen
December 1, 2010 10:14 pm

What we’re heading into is a Boldin/Fitz type of situation. Management will stick with the better wide receiver with more upside. That’s Maclin by default. I don’t want to lose Desean, but remember, DJAX fell to the Eagles in the second round……the Eagles made it a point to move UP to grab J-Mac — just some food for thought.

paulman
paulman
December 1, 2010 10:55 pm

Your right Birdo,
D-Jax fell to the Mid 2nd Round because of his attitude, Coachability and his issues with authority
while he was a youngster in High School and in College.. He fell luckily to the EAgles who grabbed him,
D-Jax lost millions of DOllars in his initial contract that he will never get back.. I think he realized his short-comings and worked on improving his off-the field actions.. Unfortunately, now he’s hooked up with
SUper Agen D Rosenhaus who could give 2 craps about Team,Loyalty,Fans,Coaches or anything else but the almighty dollar.. It’s the way he operates and unfortunately for the Eagles, they will have to deal with it. I will tell you one thing, the Eagle Franchise,FO and Coach AR will not be held hostage again by any player or by any agent, or will they put up being ridiculed by any of its players or agents.. So if D-Jax doesn’t want to play in Phila or for Coach AR then it’s c-ya later time. They got a good Season going and have lots to play for moving forward and don’t need these type of distractions…
Maclin fell to mid 1st Round after Raiders passed on him at #7 and slected D Heyward-Bey instead which had a downward ripple effect for Maclin and the Eagles moved up a few spots to grab him at #19 which most NFL Draft-geeks had Maclin rated as a top 10-12 selection.. Maclin still got 1st Round $$ and a much better contract that D-Jax did because of where he was selected.. I think Maclin stayed in the Philly after last season and bulked up, learned the playbook and is really blossoming into a top NFL WR..
I think the Eagles will have a big decision to make for next year based on if there’s a CBA in place,
if Vick is signed to a long-term deal.. But if you think about it.. Which Receiver will probably put up more consistent numbers year in and year out 3 years from now, 5 years from now… Probably Maclin and another thing is the M Vick factor, lets say the Vick signs a mega deal with Arizona and bolts the Eagles, then Kiolb remains and most likely becomes the #1 QB, then do you still keep D-Jax whose best asset is his speed/deep routes in which Kolb does not throw well enough or often enough…
Lots to play out which can all wait until after the season.. Lets go Birds..

jakedog
jakedog
December 1, 2010 11:06 pm

Some posts ago vine made the point, where is the production w djax and Vick, just like the prognostics said if v the qb , djax stats thru roof. Who is problem, v , djax, or the combo? Maybe vine sounding much smarter than u think

jakedog
jakedog
December 1, 2010 11:21 pm

I would not be hostage to a 1 maybe 2 trick jackass, a what about me guy, too small, stfu, wanted kolb over 5 , after struggles w 4′ wants 7′ now production lags, still complaining, ship his Washington nationals cap wearing ass to whomever will take him, save big red from heart attack he can,t stand his punk ass and neither can i

vinnietheevictor
vinnietheevictor
December 1, 2010 11:27 pm

Thx Jake. Sometimes I surprise even myself….not completely sure about your second post and the Big Red comments, but the first one contains questions that I find interesting.

jakedog
jakedog
December 2, 2010 12:03 am

Good analysis Paul, although don’t forget jersey sales(10)over long term production(18) entering into equation.

drummerwinslow
drummerwinslow
December 2, 2010 4:48 am

Vinnie

“Successful running games draw the safeties up? Really? Wow, I should write that down for future reference. And guys who run deep quickly back the DBs up? Did I get that right? Thanks man.”

I understand that you’re angry because Kolb is riding the pine, and thus, your sarcasm. What you obviously missed, however, is that I was responding to Jaxeagle’s question. Contrary to your own belief, it’s not all about you. A bit of narcissism?

As for 3-step drops, Reid’s got to call the pattern. Would you like Vick to throw a quick slant when the receiver is running a post pattern? Vick can’t take a 3-step drop if Reid calls for a 5-step drop. This isn’t rocket science, man.

Oh, I forgot, you believe that a drop is something the QB takes “after” he’s set up in the pocket. Football 101. You don’t take drops from the shotgun nor after you’ve already taken a drop. Anything after a drop is called a “scramble.”

Reid’s not calling many screens and no slants. I think that he’s scared that his receivers will be injured. It has nothing to do with QB.

Why do you always want to put it on Vick? In case you missed it, that was rhetorical. I already know the reason.