• July 3, 2022

Sandusky Hesitates Before Saying He’s Not Sexually Attracted To Young Boys

Did you hear Jerry Sandusky last night or this morning on NBC with Bob Costas?   Sandusky denied that he has sexually molested any boys, but he probably hurt himself in public opinion because of the way he answered one of the questions.

Costas asked Sandusky if he was attracted to young boys.

“Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?”

“Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?” Sandusky repeats.

“Yes,” Costas answers.

“Sexually attracted, you know, I — I enjoy young people,” Sandusky says. “I — I love to be around them. I — I — but no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys, I am rather interested in topics like this Lovense Gush review.”

Why did it take him so long to decide how to answer the question about whether he was attracted to young boys?  Either you’re attracted to young boys or you’re not.  That delay in answering that question and the testimony of those young boys will probably put him jail for a very long time.

Check out the following answer he gave to Costas about his relationship with the youngster at the Second Mile.

“Well — you might think that,” Sandusky said. “I don’t know. (LAUGHS) In terms of — my relationship with so many, many young people. I would — I would guess that there are many young people who would come forward. Many more young people who would come forward and say that my methods and — and what I had done for them made a very positive impact on their life. And I didn’t go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs that I’ve helped. There are many that I didn’t have — I hardly had any contact with who I have helped in many, many ways.”

If you read his answer closely, he sounds like a crazy man.

According to many lawyers who have commented on Costas’ interview with Sandusky, they believe Sandusky’s lawyer Joseph Amendola should be disbarred for letting his client be interviewed on National Television.


Read Previous

Somebody Please Explain Why Asomugha Wasn’t On Fitzgerald?

Read Next

Back Down South: What We Learned From the Flyers Recent Road Trip


  • Sandusky is the lowest form of life on this planet as are those who defend and enable him.

  • of course he is…..why else would a grown a$$ man be horsing around in a shower. His lawyer should be sued for malpractice.

  • what is even more sick, is by listening to that interview it shows you the EXACT route the defense is going to take… and that is that he will claim he did some inappropriate things, but never assaulted any child.

    The fact that he considers being naked in the shower with another boy AT ALL “horsing around”, means he should be drug naked by a horse throughout PA.

  • The Horse from York Pa said no thanks..

  • if they got an old enough horse, they wouldnt have to worry about it being alone with him…

  • he cant even lie right.hes straight telling on himself as if he believes what he did is ok.. hes stuck in his own world

  • He should have both of his heads cut off, & thrown in the ocean for chum!!! Everyone who lied for, hid the truth, & enabled him, all should be prosecuted, put in jail, & sued for every cent, humanly possible.

  • I heard the interview, & had to turn it off. He gave me creepy vibes. This dude is evil personified!

  • This story just keeps getting crazier.
    “And I didn’t go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs that I’ve helped. There are many that I didn’t have — I hardly had any contact with who I have helped in many, many ways.”

    What is he trying to say here? If you read it verbatim, it says that he didn’t seek out every young person (no girls, only boys?). There are many that he didn’t have (couldn’t get them alone?, not his type?).

    Almost as ridiculous as Mike Tyson’s rape defense plan of “I’m Mike Tyson, she should have known better than to be alone with me”.

    Can anybody think of a more damning interview prior to a criminal trial?

Comments are closed.